See, when I
took the GRE the first time around, seven years ago—has it really been that
long?—I didn’t bother preparing at all, and I was pretty mortified by my verbal
score. On the quantitative side, I did terrible—bottom 25% percent—but that
didn’t surprise me at all, nor did I figure it would matter, since I was
applying for MFA in creative writing programs. I got in to two of the three schools
I applied, so my scores must not have held me back too much.
Still. That
verbal score, it stuck with me. I’ll just come out and say it—I got a 500. I
was ranked in the 61% percentile (meaning 39% of people who took the test did
better than me). I did great on the writing part, but that verbal score
surprised me. I’m a writer. I was an English major. I read all the time. Why
was I not scoring up way at the top on the verbal part of the test?
Seven years
have passed since then. That’s seven more years of reading, six-and-a-half
years of teaching experience, and three years of graduate school (in English).
I’d like to think my verbal score will improve this time, but to hedge my bets,
I’m working on my vocabulary.
As I’ve
been studying my new words, I’ve been focusing on expanding my vocabulary for
real and not just memorizing a bunch of words that I’ll forget as soon as I take
the exam. I want to actually have a stronger vocabulary, not just for this
exam, not just so I can get into a PhD program. I want to have a stronger
vocabulary because that’s important—isn’t it?—as a writer.
When I got
the results of my first GRE, I tried to make myself feel better by reminding myself
that I’m not a fan of bombastic prose (although I didn’t use the word “bombastic”—that’s
a word I learned as I’ve been preparing for the test this time around). Concision
and simplicity, minimalism, that’s what I’m drawn to as a reader. Couldn’t I
write, then, and write well, even if my vocabulary was only better than 61% of
college graduates (and really, it’s 61% of college graduates planning to go on
to grad school, since that’s who takes the GRE)?
The answer
is obviously yes—I mean, I’ve gone on to become a published writer; I won an
award to publish my first book, for cripe’s sake—but, as Reverend Lovejoy from The Simpsons would point out, the answer
is, “Yes with a but.” Yes, I can write well with an only just higher than
average vocabulary. But I can write better
with an even better vocabulary.
As I’ve
been learning new words, I keep coming across words that I really like, words
that I can’t help but imagine using in future stories, words that have more
interesting and refined meanings than their simpler counterparts. These words
can open the door to all kinds of interesting metaphors and ideas, and though I
still think it’s important (for my tastes) that readers shouldn’t have to hold
your book in one hand and a dictionary in the other, I do think my writing can only stand to improve from the careful, unobtrusive
addition of these less common but oh-so expressive words here and there.
Funny, you blogged about this. I took GREs this fall and have finished applying to PhD programs in CW. Not sure if I'll get in anywhere or if they're worth it. Seems like a big investment, with the potential for little payoff. I mean what do you do after five years if you don't get an academic job you're screwed
ReplyDeleteThat's true. Just applying costs a lot of money, and if you get in, you're committing to five years of very low income (although my income as an adjunct is actually lower than a PhD TA's stipend, so it would be like a step up for me). But I do think it seems worth it. I hope so, anyway. Good luck, Dan. I hope you get in and I hope it does end up feeling worth it.
Delete